• HOME
  • GETTING STARTED
    • Quick Start Guide
    • Evaluation Software
    • Webinars 2025
    • Demo Videos
  • OUR PRODUCTS
    • All SimBio Modules
    • Textbook Replacements
      • SimBio Ecology
      • Intro Bio
    • Intro Bio
    • Ecology
    • Evolution
    • Cell Biology
    • Molecular Biology
  • DELIVERY SYSTEM
    • What is SimUText?
  • PRICING & ORDERING
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Employee Ownership
    • Research & Publications
    • Blog
    • Testimonials
    • Jobs
    • Accessibility
  • TECH SUPPORT
    • Knowledge Base
    • Help for Students
    • FAQ – Instructors
    • Accessibility

Mobile Menu

  • Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SimBio logo

Simulated Biology. Real Learning.

  • Evaluation Software
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • HOME
  • GETTING STARTED
    • Quick Start Guide
    • Evaluation Software
    • Webinars 2025
    • Demo Videos
  • OUR PRODUCTS
    • All SimBio Modules
    • Textbook Replacements
      • SimBio Ecology
      • Intro Bio
    • Intro Bio
    • Ecology
    • Evolution
    • Cell Biology
    • Molecular Biology
  • DELIVERY SYSTEM
    • What is SimUText?
  • PRICING & ORDERING
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Employee Ownership
    • Research & Publications
    • Blog
    • Testimonials
    • Jobs
    • Accessibility
  • TECH SUPPORT
    • Knowledge Base
    • Help for Students
    • FAQ – Instructors
    • Accessibility

Asking Different Questions Increases Learning

Home » All Things SimBio » Asking Different Questions Increases Learning

September 13, 2010 //  by Eli Meir

As we look for ideas to improve our SimUText Ecology chapters, I’ve been digging through literature on how students learn from reading. Last week I found an interesting experiment on the effect of using embedded questions. Quite a few authors have shown that giving students immediate feedback on their understanding of a topic is a great aid to learning. It turns out that story gets a little more complicated depending on what you do after providing feedback.

In a study that is now a bit old (1996) but still seems very relevant, David Reinking and colleagues from the University of Georgia used an old e-text system (Hypercard, for those of you that remember it—quite a cool program back in the day) to give students a passage to read. Every 2 – 3 paragraphs, the software presented the student with a question about the preceding paragraphs. If the student answered correctly, they simply kept reading. If they answered wrong, the program gave feedback in one of three ways. In some cases, the students were simply told they were wrong, given the correct answer, and allowed to continue reading (“Feedback Only”). In a second treatment, students were told they were wrong, asked to review the preceding material, and then asked to answer the question again. This repeated until the student got the answer right (“Review / Same Question”). A third condition was similar to the second, but after the student had a chance to review the material they were asked a different question (“Review / Different Question”). At the end, all students were given a post-test.

Making the student answer questions again until they get them right has an unexpected effect. The student will do better on the material addressed by the question, but in some cases, they do worse on other material from the same passage that wasn’t tested. The students tend to go back and skim through the reading again just looking for the correct answer to the question they were asked. That reinforces the correct answer to that particular question, but de-emphasizes other material which the students then apparently forget.

The authors of this study were particularly interested in whether the students would do a more thorough review job on all the material if, after review, they knew they would have to answer a different question than the one they initially got wrong. The results were mixed, but interesting. On questions that required making inferences, the students did better when they knew the questions would change. But on questions where they were being asked for direct recall, they did worse. The authors propose that this indicates the students were re-reading the passages more holistically when they didn’t know what the new review question would be. The students memorized details less, but spent more time grasping the overall ideas.

While this result was found for reading, it fits my intuition for other kinds of teaching as well. I think it suggests we mix up the questions we use in all kinds of teaching situations—one-on-one tutorials, clicker questions in lecture, as well as virtual biology labs and interactive chapters—whenever there is more than one important idea or fact contained in a bit of material. While the authors didn’t test this, I wonder if the technique to use in more direct teaching would be to ask the same question again after review, and then follow that with a new question (which is probably what many of us do intuitively already). The results also suggest to me that in our own work at SimBiotic, we should place questions in our modules for every important point we want students to remember, otherwise they may skim over crucial bits looking just for the information needed to answer the next question.

Author

  • Eli Meir
    Eli Meir

    SimBio founder Eli Meir brings together a PhD in biology, a long history of developing sophisticated software for both biology research and education markets, and over 20 years of experience running software companies. He has a passion for using these skills to improve education in both college and secondary schools through innovative products that let students learn by doing and playing.

    View all posts

Category: Biology Education, SimUText EcologyTag: Interactive Chapters, Student Assessment

Related Posts

Jaz Donkoh

In-class learning or homework?

John Roach

SimBio Ecology – Comprehensive ecology education

John Roach

Risk, Insurance, & Climate Policy

John Roach

The hidden benefits of Ecology courses

Eli Meir

Study Confirms the Importance of Feedback

John Roach

Climate Change & Disease

John Roach

Icky Stories as Teachable Moments

Jaz Donkoh

Highlights from SABER

John Roach

Urban Ecology – Beyond Rock & Ice

John Roach

Tackling Climate Change

John Roach

Mysteries of the Sargasso Sea

John Roach

The Vaccine Debate

Previous Post: « The Chasm of Educational Progress
Next Post: Variety is the Spice of Good Studying »

Footer

Testimonials

“[SimBio’s modules] provide a powerful environment for hands-on, active learning in Ecology and Evolution. The depth, design, and pedagogical effectiveness of these packages is unequaled. They have greatly enriched student interest and understanding in all of my courses, from Introductory Biology to Advanced Population Biology”

— Dr. Brad Lister
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

“The lab simulations have been very helpful to reinforce the lecture content and encourage students to use critical thinking skills to solve problems.”

— Patti Fallest-Strobl
Neumann University

“I was amazed how quickly and effortlessly the simulation taught them a dynamic system.”

— Paula Philbrick
University of Connecticut

“The students like [it] so much that they are working ahead of what I have assigned. They just think it’s fun. And from the quiz results I have so far, they’re really getting it. You guys are geniuses.”

— Paulette Bierzychudek
Lewis & Clark College

“Since we began using Simbio’s Ecology chapters our students consistently come to class better prepared. This is a key to the success of our hybrid flipped classroom approach.”

— Dr. Peter Curtis
Ohio State University

“That was the most fun I’ve had teaching ecology and, I would venture to guess, the most fun my students have had taking ecology from me.”

— Matt Orr
Oregon State University, Cascades

“Our students are more prepared and our class discussions are more sophisticated because SimUText is such a great out of class “instructor”. Since our students have SimUText preparation we can spend class time applying concepts and evaluating new information.”

— Emily Bernhardt
Duke University

“I LOVE that every lab is based on a real study. I LOVE that all of the labs offer an open-ended inquiry. I LOVE that the labs gradually teach the concepts and build up a repertoire of data collection techniques. Thank you, for creating them.”

— Jeanette Williams
Community College of Vermont

“I just wanted to say how great simutext has been. I could have memorized facts about the electron transport chain and passed the test, but would not have had any solid concept of what was happening inside. I hope that we continue to use it often even when things return to normal.”

— Student
Rochester Community and Technical College

“Congratulations for developing such a high quality chapter. I was very impressed by its comprehensiveness, accuracy, and thoughtful design. It really is superb.”

— Richard Boone
Humboldt State University

“I recommend your modules to anyone I can, because of all the online materials I’ve found, SimBio is really the best in content and best managed. I am definitely a SimBio fan!”

— Valerie Anderson
Marymount California University

All Things SimBio

  • Jaz DonkohIn-class learning or homework?
    By Jaz Donkoh
    September 18, 2024
  • John RoachSimBio Ecology – Comprehensive ecology education
    By John Roach
    July 18, 2024
  • John RoachRisk, Insurance, & Climate Policy
    By John Roach
    June 21, 2024
More Blog Posts →

Contact

Shipping: 1280 S. Third St W., Missoula, MT 59801
Billing: P.O. Box 7158, Missoula, MT 59807
Phone: (833) 314-7701
Fax: (617) 279-0055
Questions?

SimBio Order Form
VPAT / Accessibility Statement

Site Footer

  • Facebook

Copyright © 2025 SimBio. All Rights Reserved. Trademarks.