• HOME
  • GETTING STARTED
    • Quick Start Guide
    • Evaluation Software
    • Webinars 2025
    • Demo Videos
  • OUR PRODUCTS
    • All SimBio Modules
    • Textbook Replacements
      • SimBio Ecology
      • Intro Bio
    • Intro Bio
    • Ecology
    • Evolution
    • Cell Biology
    • Molecular Biology
  • DELIVERY SYSTEM
    • What is SimUText?
  • PRICING & ORDERING
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Employee Ownership
    • Research & Publications
    • Blog
    • Testimonials
    • Jobs
    • Accessibility
  • TECH SUPPORT
    • Knowledge Base
    • Help for Students
    • FAQ – Instructors
    • Accessibility

Mobile Menu

  • Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

SimBio logo

Simulated Biology. Real Learning.

  • Evaluation Software
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • HOME
  • GETTING STARTED
    • Quick Start Guide
    • Evaluation Software
    • Webinars 2025
    • Demo Videos
  • OUR PRODUCTS
    • All SimBio Modules
    • Textbook Replacements
      • SimBio Ecology
      • Intro Bio
    • Intro Bio
    • Ecology
    • Evolution
    • Cell Biology
    • Molecular Biology
  • DELIVERY SYSTEM
    • What is SimUText?
  • PRICING & ORDERING
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Employee Ownership
    • Research & Publications
    • Blog
    • Testimonials
    • Jobs
    • Accessibility
  • TECH SUPPORT
    • Knowledge Base
    • Help for Students
    • FAQ – Instructors
    • Accessibility

Educating pre-medical students

Home » All Things SimBio » Educating pre-medical students

November 7, 2010 //  by Eli Meir

The testing dilemma

Many of the students in our biology classes want to be doctors, and I recently stumbled on what looks like a major effort to update the pre-med curriculum, sponsored by the medical colleges association and HHMI. The thrust of the report is that to get into medical school, students should show “competency” around eight different areas of science (there are also an additional eight science competencies for medical students themselves). It’s an interesting break with transcript-based judgement of student achievement, and aligns with a lot of current thinking about science education.

The core competencies the authors came up with are quite reasonable and would probably get near universal agreement for importance. They are things like “Apply quantitative reasoning and appropriate mathematics to describe or explain phenomena in the natural world.”, or “Explain how organisms sense and control their internal environment and how they respond to external change.” Under each of these broad categories are learning objectives which in some cases seem a bit of a laundry list, but again most of us would probably agree they are generally good goals. The whole document looks like a well-thought out attempt to define what future doctors should know how to do.

Underlying this switch from passing particular courses to showing particular competencies is in some respects a switch from knowing something to knowing how to do something. A competency, such as applying quantitative reasoning to biological problems, is different than mastering an isolated body of knowledge, such as having passed a calculus class and remembering a bunch of integrals. Not surprisingly, I like that, since helping students learn ideas in a way that they can use them drives much of our design of virtual labs and interactive chapters at SimBio. But I predict that implementing this change for medical school admission will run into a pretty high wall.

Depending on competency rather than course grades puts an even greater burden on a bugaboo of education – testing, and especially standardized testing. Medical schools rely on standardized tests to help them sort through all the students who want to be doctors. It’s a lot of students (it often seems like just about all the students in a typical intro bio class), so some sort of standardized test like the MCAT is here to stay for admissions. Right now, we don’t really have good standardized tests to distinguish whether a student simply remembers lots of facts, and has figured out where to plug each one in on an exam, or whether the student actually understand concepts and can use them to think through problems. We basically hope that the first predicts the second. But I don’t think that will be enough to change how pre-med classes are run across the country. Somehow the tests have to really pick up, directly, whether the student is competent enough with each set of ideas to use them effectively in thinking about medical topics.

We don’t, by and large, have those tests now, but we have some clues about how to make those tests. Using concept inventories and careful qualitative research on student thinking, we can design better test questions for specific topics. But more broadly, computers have the potential to allow standardized tests that make students apply their knowledge by solving problems. With some help from NSF, we did a project this past spring on designing one such test for technology literacy (we’re calling it SimBio Testing Tools), and other groups are also making such attempts. I think this is a great opportunity. Reports like this one on medical students are piling up, so biology education is ripe for change. If we could just measure it, that could be the tipping point.

Author

  • Eli Meir
    Eli Meir

    SimBio founder Eli Meir brings together a PhD in biology, a long history of developing sophisticated software for both biology research and education markets, and over 20 years of experience running software companies. He has a passion for using these skills to improve education in both college and secondary schools through innovative products that let students learn by doing and playing.

    View all posts

Category: Biology Education, Research & Collaborations

Related Posts

Jaz Donkoh

In-class learning or homework?

John Roach

SimBio Ecology – Comprehensive ecology education

John Roach

Risk, Insurance, & Climate Policy

John Roach

The hidden benefits of Ecology courses

Eli Meir

Study Confirms the Importance of Feedback

John Roach

Climate Change & Disease

John Roach

Icky Stories as Teachable Moments

Jaz Donkoh

Highlights from SABER

John Roach

Urban Ecology – Beyond Rock & Ice

John Roach

Tackling Climate Change

John Roach

Mysteries of the Sargasso Sea

John Roach

The Vaccine Debate

Previous Post: « Brain Games & Quantitative Biology
Next Post: Women, Physics, and Testosterone »

Footer

Testimonials

“[SimBio’s modules] provide a powerful environment for hands-on, active learning in Ecology and Evolution. The depth, design, and pedagogical effectiveness of these packages is unequaled. They have greatly enriched student interest and understanding in all of my courses, from Introductory Biology to Advanced Population Biology”

— Dr. Brad Lister
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

“The lab simulations have been very helpful to reinforce the lecture content and encourage students to use critical thinking skills to solve problems.”

— Patti Fallest-Strobl
Neumann University

“I was amazed how quickly and effortlessly the simulation taught them a dynamic system.”

— Paula Philbrick
University of Connecticut

“The students like [it] so much that they are working ahead of what I have assigned. They just think it’s fun. And from the quiz results I have so far, they’re really getting it. You guys are geniuses.”

— Paulette Bierzychudek
Lewis & Clark College

“Since we began using Simbio’s Ecology chapters our students consistently come to class better prepared. This is a key to the success of our hybrid flipped classroom approach.”

— Dr. Peter Curtis
Ohio State University

“That was the most fun I’ve had teaching ecology and, I would venture to guess, the most fun my students have had taking ecology from me.”

— Matt Orr
Oregon State University, Cascades

“Our students are more prepared and our class discussions are more sophisticated because SimUText is such a great out of class “instructor”. Since our students have SimUText preparation we can spend class time applying concepts and evaluating new information.”

— Emily Bernhardt
Duke University

“I LOVE that every lab is based on a real study. I LOVE that all of the labs offer an open-ended inquiry. I LOVE that the labs gradually teach the concepts and build up a repertoire of data collection techniques. Thank you, for creating them.”

— Jeanette Williams
Community College of Vermont

“I just wanted to say how great simutext has been. I could have memorized facts about the electron transport chain and passed the test, but would not have had any solid concept of what was happening inside. I hope that we continue to use it often even when things return to normal.”

— Student
Rochester Community and Technical College

“Congratulations for developing such a high quality chapter. I was very impressed by its comprehensiveness, accuracy, and thoughtful design. It really is superb.”

— Richard Boone
Humboldt State University

“I recommend your modules to anyone I can, because of all the online materials I’ve found, SimBio is really the best in content and best managed. I am definitely a SimBio fan!”

— Valerie Anderson
Marymount California University

All Things SimBio

  • Jaz DonkohIn-class learning or homework?
    By Jaz Donkoh
    September 18, 2024
  • John RoachSimBio Ecology – Comprehensive ecology education
    By John Roach
    July 18, 2024
  • John RoachRisk, Insurance, & Climate Policy
    By John Roach
    June 21, 2024
More Blog Posts →

Contact

Shipping: 1280 S. Third St W., Missoula, MT 59801
Billing: P.O. Box 7158, Missoula, MT 59807
Phone: (833) 314-7701
Fax: (617) 279-0055
Questions?

SimBio Order Form
VPAT / Accessibility Statement

Site Footer

  • Facebook

Copyright © 2025 SimBio. All Rights Reserved. Trademarks.