• HOME
  • GETTING STARTED
    • Quick Start Guide
    • Evaluation Software
    • Webinars 2025
    • Demo Videos
  • OUR PRODUCTS
    • All SimBio Modules
    • Textbook Replacements
      • SimBio Ecology
      • Intro Bio
    • Intro Bio
    • Ecology
    • Evolution
    • Cell Biology
    • Molecular Biology
  • DELIVERY SYSTEM
    • What is SimUText?
  • PRICING & ORDERING
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Employee Ownership
    • Research & Publications
    • Blog
    • Testimonials
    • Jobs
    • Accessibility
  • TECH SUPPORT
    • Knowledge Base
    • Help for Students
    • FAQ – Instructors
    • Accessibility

Mobile Menu

  • Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

SimBio logo

Simulated Biology. Real Learning.

  • Evaluation Software
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • HOME
  • GETTING STARTED
    • Quick Start Guide
    • Evaluation Software
    • Webinars 2025
    • Demo Videos
  • OUR PRODUCTS
    • All SimBio Modules
    • Textbook Replacements
      • SimBio Ecology
      • Intro Bio
    • Intro Bio
    • Ecology
    • Evolution
    • Cell Biology
    • Molecular Biology
  • DELIVERY SYSTEM
    • What is SimUText?
  • PRICING & ORDERING
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Employee Ownership
    • Research & Publications
    • Blog
    • Testimonials
    • Jobs
    • Accessibility
  • TECH SUPPORT
    • Knowledge Base
    • Help for Students
    • FAQ – Instructors
    • Accessibility

Evolutionary Questions

Home » All Things SimBio » Evolutionary Questions

January 11, 2011 //  by Eli Meir

Losing is Harder Than Gaining

On the research side of SimBio, we spend a lot of time writing questions for testing whether students are learning from our labs. We also publish papers on these tests—making a really good test takes enough work to merit its own publication. So even though research is supposed to be an objective, emotionless search for the truth, I’ll admit to a sinking feeling while reading a paper by Ross Nehm and Minsu Ha on how students respond differently to evolutionary questions if you ask them in different contexts.

In a nutshell, Nehm’s research says that the stories you use in questions about evolution have a lot to do with the responses you get. If you ask questions about a single species gaining traits, for instance, students have a relatively high rate of correct responses and lower rates of what they call “naive” responses (i.e. misconceptions). On the other hand, if you ask questions about cross-species comparisons where species are losing traits, students show many more naive responses and many fewer correct responses. From a teaching perspective, it seems students have more trouble understanding trait losses across related species than trait gains within a single species.

Looking back at our own tests in this light, I’m not sure how I would reinterpret our results. On the natural selection test we developed for research on our Darwinian Snails lab, we used quantitative changes in traits rather than gain and loss, a situation Nehm and colleagues did not try. Similarly, other evolutionary tests we’ve built and published (on tree-thinking and on population genetics, for instance) don’t fit neatly into the categories that Nehm’s group looked at. But that points up the really worrying thing about these results.

Although we spend months designing each new test already to capture the same understanding we find in interviews and essays, we don’t systematically vary the elements in the questions to see what effect that has—changing species, traits, whether we ask about gains vs. losses, and on and on across many other possible features of each question. To do all that for a single test would take years of work. Basically, it’s an impossible barrier for a single group that is building teaching tools – or for a single teacher that is just trying to assess her class.

I think this further highlights the need for a real effort towards producing high-quality tests across different fields of biology that can be used to assess new teaching techniques. It has to be a community effort because each test item is a lot of work. There should be some central repository where these items, together with the research behind them, are put, and there should be a conversation within this community about how to improve test items, based on research such as Nehm’s group is doing. It would be nice to link this repository to some of the concept inventories efforts that are starting to gain traction—I would say those inventories are only useful to the extent that we can assess them accurately. Developing all this will be a bit of a slog, but our own group will be so happy the day we can just lift a test off the shelf and use it, allowing us to focus on how to teach better rather than on how to know whether we’re teaching better. That would be a real gain—and as Nehm showed, gains are easier than losses.

Author

  • Eli Meir
    Eli Meir

    SimBio founder Eli Meir brings together a PhD in biology, a long history of developing sophisticated software for both biology research and education markets, and over 20 years of experience running software companies. He has a passion for using these skills to improve education in both college and secondary schools through innovative products that let students learn by doing and playing.

    View all posts

Category: Biology Education, Evolution, Research & CollaborationsTag: Virtual Labs

Related Posts

Jaz Donkoh

In-class learning or homework?

John Roach

SimBio Ecology – Comprehensive ecology education

John Roach

Risk, Insurance, & Climate Policy

John Roach

The hidden benefits of Ecology courses

Eli Meir

Study Confirms the Importance of Feedback

John Roach

Climate Change & Disease

John Roach

Icky Stories as Teachable Moments

Jaz Donkoh

Highlights from SABER

John Roach

Urban Ecology – Beyond Rock & Ice

John Roach

Tackling Climate Change

John Roach

Mysteries of the Sargasso Sea

John Roach

The Vaccine Debate

Previous Post: « Sugary science by 10 year olds
Next Post: Fun Evolution Stories »

Footer

Testimonials

“[SimBio’s modules] provide a powerful environment for hands-on, active learning in Ecology and Evolution. The depth, design, and pedagogical effectiveness of these packages is unequaled. They have greatly enriched student interest and understanding in all of my courses, from Introductory Biology to Advanced Population Biology”

— Dr. Brad Lister
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

“The lab simulations have been very helpful to reinforce the lecture content and encourage students to use critical thinking skills to solve problems.”

— Patti Fallest-Strobl
Neumann University

“I was amazed how quickly and effortlessly the simulation taught them a dynamic system.”

— Paula Philbrick
University of Connecticut

“The students like [it] so much that they are working ahead of what I have assigned. They just think it’s fun. And from the quiz results I have so far, they’re really getting it. You guys are geniuses.”

— Paulette Bierzychudek
Lewis & Clark College

“Since we began using Simbio’s Ecology chapters our students consistently come to class better prepared. This is a key to the success of our hybrid flipped classroom approach.”

— Dr. Peter Curtis
Ohio State University

“That was the most fun I’ve had teaching ecology and, I would venture to guess, the most fun my students have had taking ecology from me.”

— Matt Orr
Oregon State University, Cascades

“Our students are more prepared and our class discussions are more sophisticated because SimUText is such a great out of class “instructor”. Since our students have SimUText preparation we can spend class time applying concepts and evaluating new information.”

— Emily Bernhardt
Duke University

“I LOVE that every lab is based on a real study. I LOVE that all of the labs offer an open-ended inquiry. I LOVE that the labs gradually teach the concepts and build up a repertoire of data collection techniques. Thank you, for creating them.”

— Jeanette Williams
Community College of Vermont

“I just wanted to say how great simutext has been. I could have memorized facts about the electron transport chain and passed the test, but would not have had any solid concept of what was happening inside. I hope that we continue to use it often even when things return to normal.”

— Student
Rochester Community and Technical College

“Congratulations for developing such a high quality chapter. I was very impressed by its comprehensiveness, accuracy, and thoughtful design. It really is superb.”

— Richard Boone
Humboldt State University

“I recommend your modules to anyone I can, because of all the online materials I’ve found, SimBio is really the best in content and best managed. I am definitely a SimBio fan!”

— Valerie Anderson
Marymount California University

All Things SimBio

  • Jaz DonkohIn-class learning or homework?
    By Jaz Donkoh
    September 18, 2024
  • John RoachSimBio Ecology – Comprehensive ecology education
    By John Roach
    July 18, 2024
  • John RoachRisk, Insurance, & Climate Policy
    By John Roach
    June 21, 2024
More Blog Posts →

Contact

Shipping: 1280 S. Third St W., Missoula, MT 59801
Billing: P.O. Box 7158, Missoula, MT 59807
Phone: (833) 314-7701
Fax: (617) 279-0055
Questions?

SimBio Order Form
VPAT / Accessibility Statement

Site Footer

  • Facebook

Copyright © 2025 SimBio. All Rights Reserved. Trademarks.